That’s not
to say that Providence doesn’t have a heart. Started by the Catholic Sisters of Providence in the late 19th century, there are traces of its original healing
ministry that can still be discerned—if you know where to look. I first saw them
displayed on stylish posters several months ago on a visit to my oncologist. They were
five “aspirational statements” of the Providence system set in attractive type,
framed and hung in an otherwise drab hallway on the sixth floor of the cancer center
in northeast Portland.
The
statements and the Bible verses to which they were referenced are as follows:
Respect: So God
created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and
female he created them. (Genesis 1:27)
Stewardship:
The earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it,the world, and all who live in it. (Psalm 24:1)
Justice: And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love
mercy and to walk humbly with your God. (Micah 6:8)
Excellence: From everyone who has been given much, much will be required;
and to whom they entrusted much, of him they will ask all the more. (Luke
12:48)
Compassion: And they brought to him all who were ill, those suffering
with various diseases and pains, and he healed them. (Matthew 4:24)
The best
time to assess the moral character of a team of doctors and nurses that has rescued you
from a bleeding tumor inside your head may not be while you’re zoned out in the
ICU. Yet that, oddly enough, is where I happened to recall seeing these
posters. It was the kindness and professionalism of a particular ICU nurse that
brought them to mind. Kenneth was exceptional. At one of the most vulnerable
moments of my life, he found the words and actions to both comfort my body and
bring me peace of mind.
Mine was not
a charity case; in fact, Providence billed my insurance company more than
$64,000 for the three days I was in their hands. That’s a shocking figure, and
is further evidence of the unsustainability of cancer care practices in this
country. This sum is typical for the kind of intensive care I required, however,
which included more than five hours of OR time with all of its attendant
expenses.
What
distinguished Providence was the quality of patient care I received throughout my
stay. I was treated with respect and compassion, which was not the
case during a less serious hospitalization at OHSU four years ago. It was not what I expected. The
neurosurgeons, in particular, personified excellence in their craft. They performed
delicate surgery on an especially dangerous tumor without causing
permanently disabling side-effects. They were stellar.
Did they and
rest of the Providence medical staff steward their resources as well as they
could? Well, they kept me alive and I am now well enough to drive and run
again. I leave it to a health economist to determine how that $64,000 bill could
have been reduced for an episode of care with an outcome as positive as mine.
I’m inclined
to give Providence the benefit of the doubt on this matter. What I observed of
its institutional culture during my stay impressed me. Almost everyone with whom I interacted—nurses,
doctors, technologists, therapists, the chaplain, etc.—seemed to know what they
were doing and were responsive to my needs. I was well cared for.
There’s
nothing that softens one’s opinion about the relative value of high-tech, high-cost
healthcare faster than to survive a health crisis like mine. I can now say, for example, that I did not seriously consider an alternative to the $2000 ambulance ride from Corvallis to Portland while my
tumor was bleeding into my brain, crushing it against the skull. I just wanted to get there--stat.
This doesn’t make me less the critic, but I would prefer to be alive than totally consistent about some of the harsh opinions I’ve previously expressed about American healthcare. Our system remains desperately in need of reform. The cost of cancer care alone could eventually bankrupt not only thousands of patients but also Medicare and possibly even our nation. It’s because cost is seldom a consideration when our lives are on the line that we dare not ignore the opinion of patients in attempting to find our way through the morass of healthcare reform.
A system that integrates some version of Providence’s
aspirational statements into the timely, efficient and affordable delivery of
proven medical practices might be a good place to start. There is not yet an
obvious model for how to do this, but we are an inventive, resourceful people
and I believe we’ll eventually strike the right balance. Our success or failure in that effort will be a measure of our humanity. I would hope not to have to
stake my life on a system that makes the interests of patients any less central
than the one I’m counting on right now.
This doesn’t make me less the critic, but I would prefer to be alive than totally consistent about some of the harsh opinions I’ve previously expressed about American healthcare. Our system remains desperately in need of reform. The cost of cancer care alone could eventually bankrupt not only thousands of patients but also Medicare and possibly even our nation. It’s because cost is seldom a consideration when our lives are on the line that we dare not ignore the opinion of patients in attempting to find our way through the morass of healthcare reform.
No comments:
Post a Comment